Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:37
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a secondary effect - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Have you ever dealt with a Christian narcissist?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
FCC threat to revoke EchoStar spectrum licenses draws widespread backlash - Ars Technica
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Have you ever met somebody so stupid that they made you question how they survived this long?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sam Darnold on final games in Minnesota: "We laid an egg on offense" - NBC Sports
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Hell Is Us' Intriguingly Bold Design Decisions Refuse To Give You A Hint - GameSpot